{"id":21,"date":"2012-11-19T15:50:27","date_gmt":"2012-11-19T15:50:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/atipus.org\/webs\/?p=21"},"modified":"2025-11-18T09:39:47","modified_gmt":"2025-11-18T09:39:47","slug":"prescripcio-i-perjudicis-causats-per-cartels","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ratinglegis.eu\/ca\/prescripcio-i-perjudicis-causats-per-cartels\/","title":{"rendered":"Prescripci\u00f3 i perjudicis causats per c\u00e0rtels"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>El proppassat 24 d\u2019octubre, el <a href=\"http:\/\/www.supremecourt.gov.uk\/decided-cases\/docs\/UKSC_2010_0236_PressSummary.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Tribunal Suprem del Regne Unit<\/a> va declarar inadmissible una demanda de danys i perjudicis presentada per BCL, empresa de granges industrials d\u2019aviram que havia adquirit vitamines a BASF. El 21 de novembre de 2001, la prove\u00efdora va ser multada per la Comissi\u00f3 Europea, com a membre del <a href=\"http:\/\/eur-lex.europa.eu\/LexUriServ\/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:006:0001:0089:ES:PDF\" target=\"_blank\">c\u00e0rtel de les vitamines<\/a>, per import de 296,16 milions d\u2019euros.<\/p>\n<p>La demandant va exercir la seva acci\u00f3 passat el periode de prescripci\u00f3 de dos anys comptats a partir de la data en qu\u00e8 esdevingu\u00e9 ferma la decisi\u00f3 de la Comissi\u00f3. BASF no la va pas impugnar, amb la qual cosa els dos anys comptaren a partir de la fi del termini de recurs contra la deicsi\u00f3 sancionadora. El Tribunal Suprem va desestimar l\u2019al\u00b7legaci\u00f3 de manca de claredat de la regla de prescripci\u00f3. Val a dir que aquesta apareix perfectament <a href=\"http:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/competition\/antitrust\/cases\/dec_docs\/37533\/37533_44_1.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">resumida a les planes Internet de la Comissi\u00f3 Europea<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Segons apunta, amb ra\u00f3, el Tribunal Suprem brit\u00e0nic, les regles procedimentals s\u00f3n compet\u00e8ncia dels Estats Membres, sempre i quan no retin impossible l\u2019exercici d\u2019una acci\u00f3 fonamentada en el Dret de la UE. El <a href=\"http:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/governance\/impact\/planned_ia\/docs\/2009_comp_023_damages_breaches_antitrust_en.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">full de ruta de la Comissi\u00f3 per a enguany<\/a>\u00a0 tampoc no en preveu cap harmonitzaci\u00f3. Aquest cas mostra que els esfor\u00e7os de la Comissi\u00f3 per <a href=\"http:\/\/ec.europa.eu\/competition\/antitrust\/actionsdamages\/files_white_paper\/impact_study.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">millorar l\u2019efic\u00e0cia d\u2019aquestes accions<\/a> depenen tamb\u00e9 de la tra\u00e7a dels juristes nacionals&#8230; alguns dels quals en debatran els <a href=\"http:\/\/antitrustconference.com\/\" target=\"_blank\">dies 22 i 23 de novembre a Barcelona<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>El proppassat 24 d\u2019octubre, el Tribunal Suprem del Regne Unit va declarar inadmissible una demanda de danys i perjudicis presentada per BCL, empresa de granges industrials d\u2019aviram que havia adquirit [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[42],"tags":[32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41],"class_list":["post-21","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sense-categoria","tag-advocats","tag-barcelona-ca","tag-basf-ca","tag-cartel-ca","tag-comissio-europea","tag-competencia-ca","tag-dret","tag-ee-mm-ca","tag-multa-ca","tag-regne-unit"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratinglegis.eu\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratinglegis.eu\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratinglegis.eu\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ratinglegis.eu\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ratinglegis.eu\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=21"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/ratinglegis.eu\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":793,"href":"https:\/\/ratinglegis.eu\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/21\/revisions\/793"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ratinglegis.eu\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=21"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ratinglegis.eu\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=21"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ratinglegis.eu\/ca\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=21"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}